Reproductive behavior in animals is influenced by a complex interplay between external sensory inputs and internal states, and is regulated by neuronal and hormonal signaling. In insects, males typically initiate mating through courtship, while females determine acceptance by integrating external sensory cues with their internal state. Consequently, female reproductive activity is modulated by multiple signaling pathways


1

–

8


. Importantly, in insects, successful copulation commonly induces profound physiological and behavioral changes in the females


<sup>5

,

9

–

18</sup>


.

Following their first mating, insect females typically reject further courtship attempts and initiate oviposition. This distinct shift in behavior and physiology is referred to as

a

post-mating response (PMR)


<sup>5

–

7

,

19

–

23</sup>


. Induction of a PMR has been documented across diverse insect taxa, for example in

D. melanogaster

, mosquitos

Anopheles gambiae

,

Aedes aegypti

, crickets (

Gryllodes sigillatus

), and the brown planthopper (BPH),

Nilaparvata lugens



<sup>6

,

10

,

15

,

18

,

21

,

24

–

28</sup>


.

Induction of a PMR commonly requires the transfer of specific seminal fluid components during copulation. In

D. melanogaster

, seminal fluid peptides, including sex peptide (SP) and DUP99B produced in male accessory glands (MAG), enter the female reproductive tract, bind to specific receptors on sensory neurons, and activate signaling pathways that drive post-mating behavior and physiology


<sup>6

,

13

,

14

,

18

,

29</sup>


. Additional factors such as Acp26Ab and ovulin (Acp26Aa) are also transferred with the seminal fluid and modulate female reproductive physiology in

D. melanogaster



<sup>30

–

33</sup>


. Notably, it has been shown that the PMR-inducing substances, produced in the MAG of various insects, are highly species-specific and not even conserved across related taxonomic groups


<sup>24

,

34</sup>


.

While MAG-derived sex peptide (SP) and its receptor (SPR) are key regulators of the female post-mating response (PMR) in

D. melanogaster



<sup>5

–

7

,

16</sup>


, additional signaling pathways intrinsic to females also modulate this process. Interneurons within abdominal neuromeres of the ventral nerve cord (VNC) promote receptivity to males by signaling via myoinhibitory peptide (MIP) to brain circuits


³⁵


. Furthermore, the neuropeptide diuretic hormone 44 (DH44) modulates female sexual receptivity through a sex-specific brain circuit; mating suppresses DH44 signaling, thereby reducing receptivity


¹


. During sexual maturation, leucokinin (LK)-expressing neurons (ABLKs) in the abdominal ganglion, downstream of SP-activated circuitry, suppress female receptivity


³⁶


. In addition to changes in receptivity, the

D. melanogaster

PMR includes a shift in diet preference toward yeast consumption. This altered feeding behavior is mediated by specific peptidergic neurons (ALKs) in the brain through LK signaling


¹²


.

Although the mechanisms and neuronal pathways underlying the post-mating response (PMR) in

D. melanogaster

are well characterized


<sup>3

,

4

,

6

,

7

,

37

–

40</sup>


, this process remains poorly understood in most non-model insects. A prominent example is the brown planthopper (BPH),

N. lugens

(Hemiptera). As a monophagous rice pest, the BPH exhibits robust reproductive capacity and remarkable environmental adaptability


⁴¹


. It has also developed high resistance to diverse chemical pesticides


<sup>42

–

44</sup>


. Consequently, elucidating reproductive physiology and behavior in BPHs is crucial for developing novel control strategies.

In BPHs, the recently identified MAG-derived peptide maccessin (macc) is transferred during copulation and triggers a PMR in females, although its receptor remains unknown


²⁴


. Notably, the same study demonstrated that a second peptide, ion transport-like peptide 1 (ITPL-1), also modulates the PMR. Whereas macc is male-specific, ITPL-1 is produced both in the MAG and endogenously in females, where it reduces female receptivity to courting males


²⁴


. Given its endogenous female expression, ITPL-1 likely functions as an intrinsic signaling component in the PMR of BPHs, analogous to the role of myoinhibitory peptide (MIP) and DH44 in

D. melanogaster

females


<sup>1

,

35</sup>


.

Here, we explored the role of another neuropeptide, corazonin (CRZ), in the reproductive behavior of BPHs. In

D. melanogaster

males, CRZ is released from interneurons of the ventral nerve cord (VNC) and acts on serotonergic projection neurons to regulate ejaculation and copulation duration


⁴⁵


, mitigates mating-induced heart rate acceleration for physiological recovery


⁴⁶


and influences post-mating dietary preference


¹²


. Surprisingly, the role of CRZ signaling in female reproduction remains unexplored. To address this gap, we investigated the role of CRZ in female reproduction, including the PMR, in BPHs and

D. melanogaster

.

Here, we demonstrate that CRZ induces a post-mating switch in receptivity in females of both species. CRZ injection in virgin females reduces receptivity to courting males and increases oviposition, while

Crz

knockdown or knockout in mated females restores receptivity to re-mating and decreases oviposition. Notably, CRZ is not produced in the male accessory gland (MAG) of either species and thus the peptide is not transferred during copulation, but acting as an endogenous female peptide signal. In BPHs, the CRZ receptor (CrzR) is highly expressed in the female reproductive tract and both CRISPR-Cas9-mediated

CrzR

knockout and RNAi-mediated knockdown disrupt the PMR, phenocopying CRZ deficiency. Critically, receptivity changes in virgin BPH female, whether induced by MAG extract (containing seminal fluid proteins) or CRZ injection, depend on presence of the CrzR. Collectively, our data demonstrate that endogenous female CRZ signaling and male seminal cues are both required to coordinate post-mating changes in physiology and behavior in females of both insects. CRZ is a paralog of the peptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone, known to regulate reproduction in vertebrates, including humans, suggesting evolutionary conservation of an ancient function.

Results

CRZ signaling reduces receptivity to courting males and stimulates oviposition in

N. lugens

females

While numerous studies have established roles of the neuropeptide CRZ in regulating aspects of male reproduction across diverse insect species


<sup>47

–

53</sup>


, research addressing its potential functions in female reproduction remains conspicuously lacking.

This study investigates the role of CRZ in female reproduction, starting with the brown planthopper (BPH),

Nilaparvata lugens

, a major agricultural pest. Initially, the

Crz

gene (GenBank accession: AB817247.1) was cloned based on transcriptome data


⁵⁴


. The deduced mature CRZ sequence in BPH, pQTFQYSRGWTNamide, is identical to that reported for most studied insect species (

Figure 1-figure supplement 1A

). Consistent with other known CRZ precursors, the BPH precursor encodes a single CRZ peptide starting at the first amino acid of the propeptide (

Figure 1-figure supplement 1A

and

B

). A comparison of the organization of selected CRZ precursor genes is shown in

Figure 1-figure supplement 1B

. Genomic analysis revealed that the CRZ precursor is encoded by two exons separated by a single intron (

Figure 1-figure supplement 1B

). The mature CRZ peptide and a scrambled control peptide (sCRZ) were synthesized for pharmacological experiments.

First, we investigated the role of CRZ signaling in the reproductive behavior and PMR of female BPHs. The PMR in BPHs, is characterized by reduced receptivity to courting males, including display of rejection behaviors, and increased oviposition


²⁴


. We found that injection of CRZ significantly reduced receptivity of virgin female BPHs to courting males (

Figure 1A

and

B

). Furthermore, virgin females injected with CRZ actively rejected courting males, exhibiting a distinct rejection behavior characterized by ovipositor extrusion and kicking or fleeing. This behavior was not observed in control females injected with sCRZ (

Figure 1 Supplementary Video 1

). Notably, the CRZ-induced mating refusal behavior in virgin females was no longer observed 24 hours after injection (

Figure 1-figure supplement 2A

). While injection of CRZ peptide did not stimulate egg production in virgin BPHs (

Figure 1-figure supplement 2B

), it significantly promoted oviposition in mated females (

Figure 1C

).

To further investigate CRZ action, we performed RNA interference (RNAi) by injecting double-stranded

Crz

RNA (

dsNlCrz

) into female BPHs, which efficiently reduced

Crz

expression (

Figure 1-figure supplement 2

). In

N. lugens

, female receptivity is transiently suppressed after mating and does not begin to recover until at least 72 h after the first mating


²⁴


; therefore, remating assays were performed at 48 h post-mating as shown in

Figure 1D

. Knockdown of

Crz

resulted in increased receptivity with 10% of the mated females mating again, and significantly reduced oviposition to approximately 60% of control levels (

Figure 1E

and

F

). In contrast,

Crz

knockdown had no effect on the receptivity of virgin females (

Figure 1E

).

Since RNAi-mediated knockdown of

Crz

in female BPHs left a residual level of gene expression (

Figure 1-figure supplement 2

), we generated two

Crz

deletion alleles,

ΔCrz

¹


and

ΔCrz

²


, using CRISPR/Cas9 (

Figure 1G-G’

) to achieve a complete ablation. Both alleles harbor deletions eliminating the mature CRZ peptide coding sequence (

Figure 1G’’

). Sanger sequencing confirmed that the deletions compromised essential triplet codons within the

Crz

open reading frame (

Figure 1-figure supplement 4

), thereby efficiently disrupting CRZ peptide expression (

Figure 1G’’

and

H

). Immunohistochemical analysis further validated the mutants, revealing a complete absence of anti-CRZ immunolabeling in homozygous

ΔCrz

¹


and

ΔCrz

²


females (

Figure 1H

). Homozygous

ΔCrz

¹


and

ΔCrz

²


virgin females are fully viable and fertile. They exhibit a courtship vigor similar to controls and their initial mating success rate with wild-type males exceeds 60% (

Figure 1I

and

J

). However, 25% of the mated mutant females were receptive to further mating (

Figure 1J

), and oviposition was significantly reduced to approximately 50% of the wild-type levels (

Figure 1K

). To further test the

Crz

mutants, we also analyzed mating and oviposition behaviors in

Crz

heterozygous (

+/ΔCrz

¹


) females. Notably, neither the remating rate nor egg production in heterozygous females differed significantly from those of wild-type controls (

Figure 1J

and

K

). These results indicate that the

Crz

loss-of-function phenotype is recessive, and that a single functional copy of

Crz

is sufficient to sustain a normal post-mating response (PMR). Collectively, these results demonstrate that diminished CRZ signaling severely perturbs the PMR in female BPHs, seen as increased post-mating receptivity and reduced egg-laying. Importantly, the

Crz

deletion abolished the onset of typical post-mating rejection behavior. We, thus, conclude that endogenous CRZ signaling is important for the induction of a PMR in female BPHs.

CRZ is produced by similar neurons in both sexes of BPHs and is absent from the male accessory gland

To further understand how CRZ regulates the PMR in BPHs, we examined the expression of CRZ and

Crz

across different tissues in males and females. The

Crz

mRNA expression was examined in various BPH tissues using both RT-PCR and qPCR (

Figure 2A

). We detected

Crz

mRNA expression primarily in the central nervous system (CNS), regardless of the primer set or detection method used, while expression was nearly undetectable in other tissues, including reproductive organs of both sexes (

Figure 2B

and

C

).

A previous study reported CRZ in four male-specific interneurons within the abdominal ganglia of

D. melanogaster



⁴⁷


. To determine whether CRZ exhibits sexually dimorphic expression in BPHs, we performed immunolabeling using an anti-CRZ antiserum. This labeled four pairs of neurons in the protocerebrum of the brain (

Figure 2D

and

E

) and one pair of neurons in the subesophageal ganglion in both males and females (

Figure 2D

and

E

). Since CRZ immunolabeled neurons in brains of most, if not all, insects studied include three or more pairs of lateral neurosecretory cells


<sup>55

,

56</sup>


, we suggest that CRZ signaling regulating the PMR may be hormonal (at least in part). Importantly, no CRZ-immunopositive neurons were detected in the abdominal ganglia of either sex (

Figure 2D

and

E

), and thus there is no evidence for sex-specific expression of CRZ in neurons in BPHs. This is in contrast to

D. melanogaster

, where we confirmed, as previously reported


⁴⁵


, the presence of CRZ-immunolabeled neurons specifically in the abdominal ganglia of males (

Figure 2 - figure supplement 1A

).

To exclude that CRZ acts as a seminal fluid peptide transferred to females during copulation, similar to sex peptide (SP) in

D. melanogaster

and macc in BPHs


²⁴


, we specifically examined CRZ expression in reproductive tissues of both sexes. However, we observed no CRZ immunolabeling in the male reproductive organs (

Figure 2F1 - F3

) or female reproductive organs (

Figure 2G1 – G3

). This aligns with our transcriptional

Crz

data shown above (

Figure 2B

and

C

). Furthermore,

Crz

mRNA and CRZ protein were absent from transcriptomic and proteomic datasets of the male accessory glands (MAGs) in BPHs


²⁴


. Collectively the available data suggest, that CRZ is not produced by the MAG and is consequently unlikely to be transferred to females as a seminal fluid component.

The CRZ receptor is essential for mediating the post mating response in female BPHs

Given our findings implicating CRZ in modulating the PMR in female BPHs, we identified the CRZ receptor (

CrzR

) gene in this species; it encodes a structurally conserved GPCR orthologous to other insect

CrzR

s (

Figure 3-supplemental figure 1

). We next explored the effect of knocking down the

CrzR

on the PMR in BPHs. RNAi-mediated knockdown of the receptor (

dsCrzR

injection) resulted in 15% of the mated females re-mating, a phenotype not seen in

dsgfp

-injected controls (

Figure 3A

and

B

) and in significantly reduced oviposition (

Figure 3C

). Importantly, CRZ injection failed to diminish receptivity in

CrzR

-knockdown virgins (

Figure 3D

and

E

). Furthermore, MAG extract (with seminal fluid proteins) injection into

dsCrzR

-treated virgins did not affect receptivity (

Figure 3F

).

To further confirm the role of the

CrzR

in the PMR of BPHs, we applied CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to mutate the

CrzR

gene and constructed a homozygous mutant strain of

CrzR

(

CrzR

^M


) by genetic crosses (

Figure 3G-3G’’

,

Fig. 3 - figure supplement 2A

). We found that the developmental time and life span of the female

CrzR

mutants, like the

Crz

mutants, were slightly extended compared to wild type animals (

Figure 3 - supplement figure 2E

and

2F

). Homozygous

CrzR

^M


females displayed increased remating rates (30%) (

Figure 3I

and

J

) and the number of eggs laid by

CrzR

^M


females was also significantly decreased (

Figure 3K

). We also examined mating and oviposition behaviors in

CrzR

heterozygous (

+/CrzR

^M


) females. Notably, both the remating rate and egg production in heterozygous females were comparable to those observed in homozygous

CrzR

mutant (

CrzR

^M


) females (approximately 30%) (

Figure 3I

and

J

). Thus, heterozygosity for the

CrzR

was sufficient to disrupt post-mating behaviors in female BPHs. These findings indicate that the

CrzR

loss-of-function phenotype is dominant, and that a single functional copy of

CrzR

is insufficient to maintain a normal post-mating response. Consistent with the

CrzR

RNAi results, neither CRZ nor MAG extract injections reduced receptivity in

CrzR

^M


virgins (

Figure 3K - M

). Finally, macc peptide injection also failed to decrease receptivity in

CrzR

-mutant virgins (70% acceptance rate), whereas it significantly suppressed mating in wild-type controls (

Figure 3N

). These results collectively demonstrate that intact CRZ/

CrzR

signaling in female BPHs is required for transducing the PMR-inducing effects of male-derived seminal factors, including macc


²⁴


.

The

CrzR

is highly expressed in the reproductive organs of female BPHs

To further elucidate the role of the CRZ signaling in regulation of the PMR, we analyzed the

CrzR

expression in

N. lugens

tissues. We first monitored

CrzR

expression by means of RT-PCR and qPCR. Both methods revealed predominant

CrzR

transcript expression in the female reproductive tract (

Figure 4A-C

). qPCR further demonstrated significantly higher

CrzR

expression in adult females than in males (

Figure 4 - figure supplement 1A

), particularly localized to female abdomens (

Figure 4 - figure supplement 1B

).

As we failed to generate a functional NlCrzR antibody, to determine the tissue expression of the receptor in more detail, we used

in situ

hybridization and confirmed strong

CrzR

expression within the female reproductive system (

Figure 4D

). No hybridization signal was detected in the lateral or common oviducts (

Figure 4D1

). However, specific labeling occurred in the sperm storage organs: the spermathecae and pouched glands of the lower reproductive tract (

Figure 4D2

and

4D2’

). These structures are the primary sites for long-term sperm storage. Specificity was validated by absence of signal in sense-probe controls (

Figure 4D3

-

D4’

). This enrichment in sperm storage organs suggests that CRZ signaling may modulate post-mating physiology in part by regulating the mobilization of stored sperm and seminal fluid.

Notably, while CrzR is highly expressed in the female reproductive tract, we acknowledge that RT-PCR and qPCR analyses also detected low but detectable CrzR expression in other tissues, including the CNS and fat body (

Figure 4B-C

). Thus, we cannot exclude the possibility that

CrzR

in the brain (e.g., by modulating neural circuits governing reproductive behavior) or fat body (e.g., by affecting post-mating metabolism and nutrient/energy allocation) may also contribute to the PMR. These non-reproductive tract sites of CrzR expression warrant further investigation to fully delineate the systemic roles of CRZ/CrzR signaling in female PMR regulation.

Endogenous CRZ signaling modulates aspects of the PMR in female Drosophila melanogaster

Having established the critical role of CRZ signaling in regulating the PMR of the female BPH, we next investigated its potential function in female reproduction, including the PMR, of the genetically tractable fly

D. melanogaster

.

We first assessed re-mating frequency in

Crz

mutant female flies (

Crz

^attp


). Approximately 40% of the

Crz

^attp


females that had experienced a first successful copulation mated again, compared to only 3% of mated wild-type control females (

Figure 5A

and

B

). Importantly, the

Crz

mutation did not affect the first mating of females (

Figure 5B

). Furthermore, mated

Crz

^attp


females laid approximately 45% fewer eggs than mated wild-type females (

Figure 5C

). These results demonstrate that CRZ signaling is necessary for aspects of the PMR in female

D. melanogaster

, specifically inhibiting re-mating and stimulating post-mating egg production. Immunohistochemical labeling confirmed the absence of CRZ protein in

Crz

^attp


mutants (

Figure 5D

).

To determine whether release of CRZ from

Crz

neurons is responsible for inhibition of remating and stimulation of oviposition, we knocked down

Crz

expression specifically in CRZ-producing neurons using the GAL4-UAS system (

Crz-GAL4 > UAS-Crz-RNAi

). Consistent with the mutant phenotype, 22% of the mated

Crz-GAL4 > UAS-Crz-RNAi

females mated again after their first successful mating with wild-type males, whereas only 2% of the control females (

Crz-GAL4/+

) did so (

Figure 5E

). Virgin receptivity was again unaffected by

Crz

knockdown (

Figure 5E

). Additionally, mated

Crz-GAL4 > UAS-Crz-RNAi

females laid approximately 20% fewer eggs than mated controls (

Crz-GAL4/+

) (

Figure 5F

). To further confirm the role of CRZ neuropeptide in modulation of the PMR in females, we injected this peptide in virgin females. Consistent with the above results, CRZ injected virgins displayed a reduced response to mating attempts (

Figure 5G

). To determine whether CRZ modulates the PMR endogenously also in female

D. melanogaster

, we first examined whether the male accessory gland (MAG) expresses

Crz

. RT-PCR analysis revealed no detectable

Crz

transcripts in the

D. melanogaster

MAG (

Figure 5H

), indicating that the MAG does not synthesize the CRZ peptide. To further exclude the possibility that CRZ or any other

Crz-

precursor-derived peptide might enter the AG from other sources, we used the GAL4–UAS system to visualize

Crz

/CRZ-producing neurons and performed immunolabeling with anti-CRZ antibodies. Neither approach revealed any signal in the MAG (

Figure 5I

). Some GFP signals were observed in cells of the testes (indicated by white arrows), whereas no corresponding signal was detected by CRZ immunohistochemistry (

Figure 5I

).

To further evaluate whether the MAG could be a source of CRZ, we interrogated publicly available single-cell transcriptomic datasets from the Fly Cell Atlas covering the male reproductive glands (including MAG main and secondary cells, ejaculatory duct/bulb epithelium, secretory and muscle cells) and the male testis (

Figure 5 - figure supplement 1

). In the MAG atlas,

Crz

transcripts were undetectable across MAG main and secondary cells as well as other gland-associated cell types (

Figure 5 - figure supplement 1A

). In contrast, the MAG-derived sex peptide (SP) was robustly detected, confirming correct tissue representation and cell-type annotation (

Figure 5 - figure supplement 1A

). In the testis atlas, Crz expression was sparse and restricted to a small subset of cells rather than enriched in any major spermatogenic lineage (

Figure 5 - figure supplement 1B

and

C

), whereas β2-tubulin prominently marked spermatogenic populations (

Figure 5 - figure supplement 1B

). Hence, these single-cell data support our RT-PCR and anti-CRZ immunolabeling findings. Together, our data demonstrate that the male accessory gland does not produce or sequester CRZ. In conclusion, like in BPHs, CRZ acts endogenously in females to modulate post-mating behavior also in

D. melanogaster

.

Discussion

Our study unveils a novel function of CRZ in an endogenous female signaling pathway that modulates the post-mating reproductive behavior and physiology (collectively PMR) in BPHs. It is, thus, the first report linking CRZ to a PMR in insects. In contrast to SP and DUP99B in

D. melanogaster



<sup>5

,

18</sup>


, HP-1 in

Aedes aegypti



¹⁵


and maccessin (macc) recently identified in BPHs


²⁴


, CRZ is not produced in the MAG, and thus not transferred from males during copulation. Instead, it is acting as an endogenous peptide derived from neuroendocrine cells in the female brain. Moreover, this CRZ-mediated endogenous modulation in females is seen also in

D. melanogaster

. When

Crz

is knocked down or knocked out in flies, mated females likewise exhibit an altered PMR.

Focusing on the endogenous CRZ signaling in female BPHs, our main findings using mutants and RNAi of both

Crz

and

CrzR

, demonstrate that CRZ signaling decreases the female responsiveness to courting males, especially in already mated females. Also, oviposition in mated BPHs is increased by CRZ signaling. CRZ immunolabeling revealed a small set of neurons in the brain and subesophageal ganglion and no CRZ was detected in reproductive organs. Thus, the likely source of CRZ affecting the PMR is the CRZ-producing neuroendocrine cells in the brain. In insects studied so far (including other hemipterans), there are at least three pairs of CRZ expressing lateral neurosecretory cells with axon terminations in the corpora cardiaca


<sup>55

,

56</sup>


, suggesting that in BPHs and

D. melanogaster

hormonal CRZ may contribute to the modulation of the PMR. However local CRZ signaling in brain circuits cannot be excluded since the CRZ neurons arborize extensively within the brain.

We found that the CRZ receptor,

CrzR

, is predominantly expressed in the female reproductive tract in BPHs, more specifically in the lower tract including the spermatheca and pouched gland, which are sites of sperm and seminal fluid storage. Thus, in BPHs, CRZ may act to regulate the release of stored sperm and seminal fluid in the female. This regulation would also gate the flow of male-derived factors that induce and maintain the PMR, such as macc and ITPL-1. As mentioned, we cannot exclude additional action of CRZ in neuronal circuits in the CNS that regulate female sexual arousal and reproductive behavior, since our PCR data indicate expression of the

CrzR

also in the CNS. Additionally, the fat body of BPHs, express

CrzR

, similar to

D. melanogaster



⁵⁷


, possibly suggesting a role of CRZ in post-mating metabolism.

The brain CRZ neurons of BPHs are likely to be activated by sensory signals from the female reproductive tract upon copulation and hence release CRZ into the circulation (and maybe within the brain). In

D. melanogaster

, sensory neurons in the reproductive tract are activated by SP (via the SP receptor), and signal via a chain of ascending axons of the VNC to sex-specific neurons in the brain to induce the PMR switch in behavior and physiology


<sup>7

,

38

,

40

,

58</sup>


. Thus, in

D. melanogaster

, these sex-specific circuits may also activate the CRZ neurons. Possibly similar sensory and sex-specific neurons exist in BPHs and respond either to mechanical stimuli or factors in the seminal fluid leading to activation of CRZ neurons and other brain neurons that regulate the PMR.

The female PMR is complex in

D. melanogaster

and not only receptivity and oviposition are affected, but also feeding, metabolism, sleep patterns and aggression


<sup>5

,

16

,

18

,

19

,

59

,

60</sup>


. In BPHs only the receptivity (and associated rejection behavior) and oviposition have been analyzed in any detail. We found that the MAG-derived peptides transferred with the semen, macc and ITPL-1, only affected the receptivity


²⁴


, whereas we show here that CRZ affects also oviposition. Thus, we have identified three different peptides CRZ, macc and ITPL-1 that all influence the PMR in different ways, suggesting complex regulatory mechanisms also in BPHs.

It is interesting to note that CRZ is an evolutionarily conserved neuropeptide that has been found in most, but not all, insect species and it displays a wide array of functions


<sup>56

,

57

,

61

,

62</sup>


. The CRZ function varies across different insect species, but a common role seems to be in regulation of stress


<sup>62

–

64</sup>


. Other functions are for example: in the American cockroach, CRZ accelerates the heart rate


⁶⁵


, in locusts, it triggers the formation of pigments that darken the body color in gregarious insects


⁶⁶


, in the moth

Bombyx mori

, CRZ affects developmental speed and reduces the rate of silk spinning behavior


⁶⁷


; in

D. melanogaster

larvae, CRZ regulates molting motor behavior


⁶⁸


and growth


⁶⁹


; in adult

D. melanogaster

CRZ regulates stress responses, food intake and metabolism


<sup>57

,

70</sup>


, and protein food preference


¹²


, as well as sperm ejection and mating duration in males


⁴⁵


; and in social ants, it regulates the social hierarchy and inhibits egg-laying in the queen


⁴⁸


. Finally, a recent study found that CRZ mediates a diapause-induced suppression of reproduction in female bean bugs


⁷¹


. To all these functions can now be added the role of CRZ in reproductive behavior and physiology of female BPHs and

D. melanogaster

. Finally, building on the role of CRZ in metabolism shown in

D. melanogaster



⁵⁷


, it is possible that CRZ also regulates post-mating metabolism in female BPHs and flies. Thus, there may be a link between CRZ and the altered feeding and metabolism commonly seen in mated female insects that ensures optimal egg development


<sup>5

,

9

,

16</sup>


.

CRZ and the vertebrate peptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) are paralogs that arose via an ancient gene duplication, and act on evolutionarily conserved receptors


<sup>72

,

73</sup>


.

Bona fide

GnRHs have not been found in arthropods and the CRZ peptide has been lost in the vertebrate lineage, but the cephalochordate (lancelet)

Branchiostoma floridae

does have peptides of both types


⁷³


. In vertebrates, including humans, GnRH regulates female reproduction (specifically sexual maturation)


<sup>74

,

75</sup>


. We have shown here that CRZ regulates reproductive behavior and physiology in females of

D. melanogaster

and previous reports demonstrated a role in female fecundity


⁷⁶


and a reproductive function also in males of this species


⁴⁵


. Thus, CRZ and GnRH share a major function that may be ancient, although CRZ signaling in insects has evolved to also regulate stress responses, metabolism and development


<sup>57

,

62

,

77</sup>


.

Some outstanding questions remain with respect to mechanisms of CRZ signaling in the female PMR. The inputs triggering release of hormonal CRZ at mating are not known in BPHs or flies. This can probably be best investigated in

Drosophila

where brain neurons that are targets of the sex peptide receptor expressing neurons in the oviduct have been identified


⁵⁸


, and synaptic inputs to CRZ producing brain neurons have been described


⁷⁸


. Once candidate interneurons interacting with the CRZ neurons have been identified, genetic manipulations of these neurons may unveil how mating triggers endogenous CRZ signaling and the PMR. Another aspect of CRZ signaling that merits further study in

Drosophila

is the link between CRZ and the post-mating change in feeding and metabolism. At present it is not known whether also BPHs change their feeding and metabolism after mating, but would be valuable to investigate to determine to what extent the PMR in the two insects are similar. Finally, since BPHs are a major rice pest, it may be useful to further investigate the regulation of the PMR to design novel strategies for control their reproduction.

Method details

Experiment insects

All the brown planthoppers used in this research were collected from Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province in 1995. The insects were kept indoors on fresh rice seedlings (Taichung Native 1, TN1) in a growth chamber at 27 ± 1 °C and 70 ± 10% relative humidity, under a 16 h:8 h (Light: Dark) photoperiod


⁷⁹


.

All

D. melanogaster

stocks were raised in standard cornmeal–molasses–agar medium maintained at 25° C, 60% humidity, and under 12 hr:12 hr light:dark conditions. We used Canton s flies as the wild-type strain. The relevant information about fruit flies used in the experiments are shown in key resources table.

Male accessory gland protein extraction of

Nilaparvata lugens

Protein extraction was performed as described previously


²⁴


. Male accessory glands (MAGs) were dissected from 3–5-day-old virgin males in phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) under a stereomicroscope. For protein extraction, approximately 300 MAGs were collected, immediately frozen, and stored at −80 °C until use. Frozen MAGs were pre-ground in liquid nitrogen and then lysed in 500 μL protein cracking buffer (100 mM NH₄HCO₃, 8 M urea, 0.2% SDS, pH 8.0) with thorough homogenization. Lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C, and the supernatants were collected as soluble protein extracts. Protein concentration was determined using a Bradford colorimetric assay (BSA as the standard; absorbance at 595 nm). Protein integrity and quality were assessed by SDS–PAGE. Protein extracts were stored at −80°C until next step experiment.

Behavior assays of

Nilaparvata lugens

Mating and receptivity

All BPHs were raised in incubator

s

with a 16 h:8 h dark:light cycle. Unmated female and male BPHs were collected within 12 hours of emergence. For RNAi or neuropeptide injection treatment, the protocol is shown in

Figure 1A

and

Figure 1D

. The mating behavior (or female receptivity behavior) test in this study usually conducted the first mating between 3 and 5 days after emergence. The mating experiment was completed in a plastic tube (2.5cm in diameter and 10cm in height). Fresh rice seedlings of appropriate length were placed in each tube, and then a female and a male BPH was added. The mating conditions and other reproductive behavior parameters during this period were observed in a constant temperature room at 25°C for 30min, and the males were taken out after 30 min. In

N. lugens

, mating induces a transient suppression of female receptivity that is not permanent; females typically start to regain remating willingness 72 h after the first mating, as documented in our previous study


²⁴


. This temporal window guided the design of our remating assays, in which females were paired with naive males at 48 h, post-initial mating to capture both the suppressed and recovered phases of receptivity. For the experiment requiring a second mating, females successfully mated for the first time were retained. After 48 hours, wild-type males were put in for the re-mating test. The males in all secondary mating experiments were wild type. The monitoring time for each mating behavior was 30 minutes; the receptivity rate refers to the proportion of successful matings of female individuals within the 30-minute measurement period.

Egg laying

After completing the first mating, the male is sucked out and a sufficient number of rice seedlings are added to the tube, and the female is retained to lay eggs in the tube. After 72 hours, the spawning female is transferred out of the tube. After the eggs have matured, about 4-5 days later, we used tweezers to gently manipulate the rice seedlings and counted the number of fertilized eggs produced by the females. Note that 4 to 5 days after the egg is produced, the successfully fertilized egg will display red eye-spots. Oviposition assay protocol: For quantitative assessment of post-mating responses, egg-laying activity was monitored over a 72-hour observation window following verified initial copulation. To eliminate confounding effects from sequential mating trials, experimental subjects undergoing oviposition measurement were permanently excluded from subsequent re-mating evaluations.

To assess oviposition in females injected with CRZ peptide, virgin or mated female BPHs (3–5 days post-emergence) were transferred into plastic tubes containing sufficient rice seedlings 6 h after recovery from peptide injection. Females were allowed to oviposit for 24 h and were then removed. Eggs were subsequently counted by gently dissecting the rice seedlings with forceps.

Behavior assays of

D. melanogaster

Mating and re-mating: During the receptivity assessment, all experimental fruit flies were virgin flies that emerged within 12 hours in a 20°C incubator in a 12 h:12 h dark:light cycle. After collection, they were kept at 25°C incubator in a 12 h:12 h dark:light cycle for 4 days before behavioral testing. Receptivity behavior measurement: a perforated plate was placed on top of a non-perforated plate. Male fruit flies were briefly anesthetized on ice and gently transferred into the holes of the perforated plate, with one male per hole. Once the male transfer was completed, a plastic film was gently placed over the perforated plate, followed by covering it with another perforated plate. Then, the virgin female fruit fly, also anesthetized on ice, was placed in each hole. After the transfer was completed, a non-perforated plate was placed on top. This setup was then transferred to a 25°C incubator to acclimate for 30 minutes. The plastic film separating the male and female flies was quickly removed, and video recording began for 30 minutes. The recorded videos were analyzed to calculate the acceptance rate of the females. Successful mating females were collected and individually transferred into plastic tubes containing sufficient artificial food for fruit flies to lay eggs. After 24 hours of laying eggs, the female flies were transferred to a new finger-shaped tube with ample artificial feed for another 24 hours of laying. After 48 hours, these egg-laying females were subjected to a secondary mating assessment with wild-type, unmated males, using the same method as described above, to evaluate the acceptance rate during the second mating process. Additionally, the number of eggs laid by each female during the 48 hours was recorded. Egg laying for mated females: First, collect virgin female fruit flies that eclosion within 12 hours at 20°C incubator in a 12 h:12 h dark:light cycle and then keep them in a 25°C incubator in a 12 h:12 h dark:light cycle for 4 days. After that, unmated males of the wild type and virgin females were mixed 1:1.5 times. 24 hours after full mating, female flies were lightly anesthetized with ice and transferred to plastic vials containing enough artificial fruit fly food for them to lay eggs for 24 hours. After 24 hours, the flies were transferred again to a new bottle full of artificial food for another 24 hours of egg laying. The number of eggs in each vial is calculated under a microscope, and the total number of eggs in the two vials of each female fruit fly represents the egg-laying capacity of that individual.

Developmental duration statistics

Nymphs of BPHs that hatched synchronously from distinct genotypes were collected and reared in plastic cups containing fresh rice seedlings; the seedlings were replaced regularly to maintain optimal conditions. From the day the nymphs reached the fifth instar, cups were inspected daily for adult emergence, and the number of newly emerged adults was recorded. After all surviving individuals had completed eclosion, the total nymph-to-adult developmental duration was calculated.

BPHs survival rate statistics

For neuropeptide injection: After 4-day emergence, virgin BPHs were injected with CRZ neuropeptide or scrambled CRZ, and after 6 hours of recovery, these insects were placed into a plastic tube with sufficient quantity of rice seedlings. Survival was monitored every 24 hours until all specimens were dead.

For mutant: Wild-type and mutant BPHs adults that eclosed on the same day were individually confined in plastic tubes, each supplied with ample fresh rice seedlings and water renewed regularly to ensure optimal living and nutritional conditions. The number of surviving individuals of each genotype was recorded every 24 h until all had died, and survival curves were generated from these data.

Neuropeptide synthesis and injection

Corazonin (CRZ) and scrambled CRZ (sCRZ) were synthesized by Genscript Co. Ltd (Nanjing, China). Peptide masses were confirmed by Mass spectrometry and the amount of peptide was quantified by amino acid analysis. The amino acid sequences of the peptides used in this study are:

N. lugens

corazonin:

pQ

TFQYSRGWNamide; scrambled corazonin:

pQ

SRYTTFGQWTNamide. On the fourth day after adult emergence, virgin female BPHs were injected with different concentrations of synthetic CRZ peptide and control scrambled peptide. The scrambled peptide control was used to monitor for potential non-specific effects on behavior due to the process of injection. Each mg peptide was dissolved in 100 μl DMSO solution (Acmec, #D54264), and then diluted to 1.5 mM, 0.15 mM, 0.015 mM and 0.0015 mM with 1×PBS as solvent. The BPHs were anesthetized with CO

₂

for about 30 seconds and placed abdomen up on 2% agarose (Solarbia, #A8201) plate and 50 nl neuropeptide solution injected into each female. Six hours after neuropeptide injection the insects were used for behavior assay.

Gene cloning and sequence analysis

We used the NCBI database with BLAST programs to carry out sequence alignment and analysis. Then we predicted Open Reading Frames (ORFs) with EditSeq. The primers were designed by Primer designing tool in NCBI. Total RNA Extraction was using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA template used for cloning was synthesized using the Biotech M-MLV reverse transcription kit and the synthesized cDNA template was stored at −20°C. The transmembrane segments and topology of proteins were predicted by TMHMM v2.0 (

)


⁸⁰


. Multiple alignments of the complete amino acid sequences were performed with Clustal Omega (

).

qRT-PCR for spatial expression pattern and RNAi efficiency

The nervous system (NS), fat body (Fb), digestive system (DS), epidermis (EP), male reproductive organs (MRO) and female reproductive organs (FRO) from 3-5 days old adults were dissected in 1×PBS, to determine the tissue-specific expression pattern. With the exception of the reproductive system, the rest of the tissue comes from both sexes equally. The adult BPHs were placed on ice under slight anesthesia and dissected under a stereoscopic microscope (ZEISS). At least 50 individuals were dissected as one sample for tissue-specific analysis with three replicates. All tissues were quickly transferred to Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) solution at 0° C after dissection.

For RNAi efficiency testing, we collected the whole bodies of BPHs and transferred to a 1.5 mL EP tube containing Trizol reagent. Total RNA extraction was using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA template used for cloning was synthesized using the Biotech M-MLV reverse transcription kit and the synthesized cDNA template was stored at −20°C.

Real-time qPCRs of the various samples used the UltraSYBR Mixture (with ROX) Kit (CWBIO, Beijing, China). The PCR was performed in 20μl reaction including 2 μl of 10-fold diluted cDNA, 1 μl of each primer (10 μM), 10μl 2 × UltraSYBR Mixture, and 6 μl RNase-free water. The PCR conditions used were as follows: initial incubation at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s and 60°C for 45 s.

N. lugens

18S rRNA and actin were used as an internal control (primers listed in Table1). Relative quantification was performed via the comparative 2

^−ΔΔCT

method


⁸¹


.

RNAi and RNAi efficiency determination

For lab-synthesized dsRNA,

gfp

, Nl

CrzR

and Nl

Crz

were amplified by PCR using specific primers conjugated with the T7 RNA polymerase promoter (primers listed in Table1). dsRNA was synthesized by the MEGAscript T7 transcription kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Finally, the quality and size of the dsRNA products were verified by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and the Nanodrop 1000 spectrophotometer and kept at −70°C until use. 3-5 days old virgin female BPHs were used for injection of 50nl of 5 μg/μl dsRNA per insect. Injection of an equal volume of ds

gfp

was used as negative control. After 48 hours, the insects were used behavior assays and gene relative expression analysis.

Neuropeptide injection after RNAi

48 hours after the ds

CrzR

injection, each insect was injected again with 10 ng of peptide dissolved in 50 nL of 1 × PBS balanced salt solution. Recovery was for six hours after injection. These insects were used for behavior assays. RNAi efficiency was examined by qPCR using a pool of ten individuals 48 hours after dsRNA injections.

In vitro synthesis of sgRNA and Cas9 mRNA

The single guide RNA (sgRNA) was designed as previously reported


⁸²


. Briefly, sgRNA was designed by manually searching genomic sequence around the region of the

Crz

and

CrzR

exon for the sequences corresponding to 5’-N

_17-20

NGG-3’, where NGG is the protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) of SpCas9 and N is any nucleotide. For in vitro transcription of sgRNA, were synthesized in vitro using the GeneArt™Precision gRNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania) according to the instructions of manufacturer. The Cas9 protein (TrueCut™Cas9 Protein v2, Cat. NO. A36497) was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Shanghai, China).

Embryo microinjection, crossing and genotyping

The embryonic injection was performed as previously reported


⁸³


. The female BPHs, which had been mated for 3-6 days after emergence, were selected to lay eggs. After 30 minutes, the embryos were transferred onto double-sided tape attached to a microscope slide along the long edge by gently pressing the slide onto the dorsal surface of embryos. A few drops of halocarbon oil 700 was added to these eggs. About 0.5–1 nL mixture of Cas9 protein (200 ng/μL) and sgRNA (100 ng/μL) was injected into each egg using a FemtoJet and Inject Man NI 2 microinjection system (Eppendorf, Germany). After the injection, the eggs were placed in Petri dishes covered with moist filter paper, and the Petri dishes were placed in plant growth chamber at 27±1 °C, 70±10% RH for hatching. These eggs hatched into G0 generations.

Crossing and genotyping

To establish homozygous mutants of

Nilaparvata lugens

through CRISPR-mediated gene editing, newly emerged G0 adults were outcrossed with wild-type counterparts to generate G1 progeny. Following successful mating and oviposition, genomic DNA was extracted from G0 adults for mutation screening. The target region surrounding NlCrzR was amplified by PCR using specific primers NlCrzR-check-F and NlCrzR-check-R (primer sequences listed in

Table 1

), followed by Sanger sequencing to identify G0 individuals carrying mutations.

Progeny (G1) from mutation-positive G0 parents were maintained through sibling crosses to establish G2 populations. Subsequent genotyping via Sanger sequencing was performed on G1 individuals to select breeding pairs where both male and female parents carried heterozygous mutations. The resulting G2 offspring from these validated pairs were then subjected to intercrossing to ultimately generate homozygous mutant lines. After homozygous mutant lines were established, virgin homozygous mutant females were paired individually with virgin wild-type males. Following successful copulation, inseminated females were transferred to fresh rice seedlings for oviposition, and fertilized eggs were allowed to hatch. Hatched nymphs were continuously reared on fresh rice seedlings until the fifth instar. Rice seedlings were replaced every 12 hours, and newly emerged adults were collected and sex-separated for subsequent behavioral assays.

Quantitative RT-PCR

The first-strand cDNA was synthesized with HiScript II Q RT SuperMix for qPCR (+gDNA wiper) kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) using an oligo (dT)18 primer and 500 ng total RNA template in a 10 μl reaction, following the instructions. Real-time qPCRs in the various samples used the UltraSYBR Mixture (with ROX) Kit (CWBIO, Beijing, China). The PCR was performed in 20 μl reaction including 4 μl of 10-fold diluted cDNA, 1 μl of each primer (10 μM), 10 μl 2 × UltraSYBR Mixture, and 6 μl RNase-free water. The PCR conditions used were as follows: initial incubation at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s and 60°C for 45 s.

N. lugens

18S rRNA or

D. melanogaster

rp49 were used as an internal control (

Table 1

). Relative quantification was performed via the comparative 2

^−ΔΔCT

method (Livak, K. J,2001).

Immunohistochemistry

Adult BPHs, 3-5 days old, were dissected under 1x phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) in Schneider’s insect medium (S2). We dissected the brain, ventral nerve cord and reproductive system of the BPHs. These tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. After extensive washing with PTX (0.5% Triton X100, 0.5% bovine serum albumin in PBS), blocked in 3% normal goat serum. Then, the tissues were incubated in Anti - CRZ for 12 hours at 4℃ and in secondary antibody for 12 h at 4℃. Primary antibodies used were: rabbit anti - CRZ (1:1000, Anti - CRZ was gift from Jan A. Veenstra), mouse anti-Bruchpilot (1:1000, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank nc82). Secondary antibodies used: donkey anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to Alexa 488 (1:500, R37118, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and donkey anti-mouse IgG conjugated to Alexa Alexa 555 (1:500, R37115, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The samples were mounted in Vectorshield (Vector Laboratory). Images were acquired with Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscopes, and were processed with Image J software. All antibodies were diluted in PTX solution. The primary antibody was diluted at a ratio of 1:1000, while the secondary antibody was diluted at a ratio of 1:500.

Adult female

D. melanogaster

, 3-5 days old, were dissected under 1 x phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) in Schneider’s insect medium (S2). We dissected the brain, ventral nerve cord and reproductive system. These tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. After extensive washing with PTX (0.5% Triton X100, 0.5% bovine serum albumin in PBS), blocked in 3% normal goat serum. Then, the tissues were incubated in Anti - CRZ and Anti - nc82 for 12 hours at 4℃ and in secondary antibody for 12 h at 4℃. Primary antibodies used were: rabbit anti-CRZ (1:1000, A11122, Provided by Jan A. Veenstra). Secondary antibodies used: donkey anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to Alexa 488 and anti-mouse IgG conjugated to Alexa 555 (R37118, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The samples were mounted in Vectorshield (Vector Laboratory). Images were acquired with Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscopes, and were processed with Image J software. All antibodies were diluted in PTX solution.

Fluorscent in situ hybridization (FISH)

FISH was performed as previously reported by Yan et al.


⁸⁴


. Briefly, the reproductive system of the female BPH dissection was performed under 1x Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) supplemented with a protease and

p

hosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Shyuanye, #R40012) on a clean, clear rubber pad using two fine forceps (Dumont, #0108-5-po). Dissected tissues were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) (Shyuanye, #22039) diluted in 1 x PBS with 0.1% Tween20 (0.1% PBST) at room temperature (RT) for 20 min on a shaker. Fixed tissues were washed three times with 0.1% PBST for 15 min each on a shaker. The tissues were dehydrated in 25%, 50%, 90% and 100% methanol, and then rehydrated in reverse order, performed at room temperature for 10 minutes at a time. The tissue was then washed twice with 0.1% PBST and shaken for 5 minutes. A post fixation was performed by incubating the tissue in 4% PFA in 1 x PBS on a shaker for 20 minutes, followed by two washes with PBST for 5 minutes each while shaking. The tissue was permeabilized with proteinase K (10 µg/ml) at room temperature for 2 minutes. After incubation, the tissue was washed with 0.1% PBST for 5 minutes while shaking. The PBST was removed, and pre-hybridization solution (Boster, #AR0152) was applied at 55°C for approximately 2 hours. The DIG probes were denatured in a metal bath at 80°C for 5 minutes and then immediately placed on ice. The denatured DIG-labeled probes were added to the hybridization solution, and hybridization was carried out overnight at 55°C. Then, the hybridized tissue was washed twice at 55°C for 40 minutes with warm pre-hybridization solution, followed by four washes at room temperature with 0.1% PBST for 10 minutes each. The detection of the DIG-labeled probes was performed using an anti-DIG conjugated fluorescent antibody (1:100 dilution, Jackson, #200-542-156), incubated at room temperature in 0.1% PBST for 2 hours, followed by three washes with 0.1% PBST. Finally, the tissue was mounted in mounting medium and imaged using a Zeiss confocal microscope.

Quantification and statistical analysis

All graphs were generated using Prism 9 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). Data presented in this study were first verified for normal distribution by D’Agostino– Pearson normality test. If normally distributed, Student’s

t

test was used for pairwise comparisons, and one-way ANOVA and chi-square was used for comparisons among multiple groups. If not normally distributed, Mann–Whitney test was used for pairwise comparisons, and Kruskal–Wallis test was used for comparisons among multiple groups, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons. All data are presented as mean ± s.e.m.

Data availability

All of the RNA sequence data in this article have been deposited in the China National Center for Bioinformation database and are accessible in PRJCA045433. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files; source data files have been provided for all figures.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Jan A. Veenstra for providing CRZ antibody. This project was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFD1700200) to S.-F.W., the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32472542) to S.-F.W..

Additional files

Figure 1 Supplementary Video 1

Additional information

Funding

MOST | National Key Research and Development Program of China (NKPs) (2022YFD1700200)

• 
  

  
  Shun-Fan Wu
  

  
  

MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (32472542)

• 
  

  
  Shun-Fan Wu
  

  
  

References

• 
  
  1.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Do-Hyoung Kima
     
  
  
  2. 
     Y.-Hoon J.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Minsik Y.
     
  
  
  4. 
     K.-Min L.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Young-Joon Kima
     
  
  
  
  
  2024
  
  
  
  Long-term neuropeptide modulation of female sexual drive via the TRP channel in Drosophila melanogaster
  
  
  
  
  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  2.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Sun M.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Ma M.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Deng B.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Li N.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Peng Q.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Pan Y
     
  
  
  
  
  2023
  
  
  
  A neural pathway underlying hunger modulation of sexual receptivity in Drosophila females
  
  
  
  
  Cell Rep
  
  
  42
  
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  3.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Wang F.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Wang K.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Forknall N.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Parekh R.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Dickson B.J
     
  
  
  
  
  2020
  
  
  
  Circuit and Behavioral Mechanisms of Sexual Rejection by Drosophila Females
  
  
  
  
  Current biology: CB
  
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  4.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Wang K.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Wang F.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Forknall N.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Yang T.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Patrick C.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Parekh R.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Dickson B.J
     
  
  
  
  
  2021
  
  
  
  Neural circuit mechanisms of sexual receptivity in Drosophila females
  
  
  
  
  Nature
  
  
  589
  
  :577–581
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  5.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Kubli E
     
  
  
  
  
  2003
  
  
  
  Sex-peptides: seminal peptides of the Drosophila male
  
  
  
  
  Cell Mol Life Sci
  
  
  60
  
  :1689–1704
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  6.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Yapici N.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Kim Y.J.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Ribeiro C.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Dickson B.J
     
  
  
  
  
  2008
  
  
  
  A receptor that mediates the post-mating switch in Drosophila reproductive behaviour
  
  
  
  
  Nature
  
  
  451
  
  :33–37
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  7.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Yang C.H.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Rumpf S.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Xiang Y.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Gordon M.D.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Song W.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Jan L.Y.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Jan Y.N
     
  
  
  
  
  2009
  
  
  
  Control of the postmating behavioral switch in Drosophila females by internal sensory neurons
  
  
  
  
  Neuron
  
  
  61
  
  :519–526
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  8.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Rezaval C.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Pavlou H.J.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Dornan A.J.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Chan Y.B.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Kravitz E.A.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Goodwin S.F
     
  
  
  
  
  2012
  
  
  
  Neural circuitry underlying Drosophila female postmating behavioral responses
  
  
  
  
  Current biology: CB
  
  
  22
  
  :1155–1165
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  9.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Camus M.F.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Huang C.C.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Reuter M.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Fowler K
     
  
  
  
  
  2018
  
  
  
  Dietary choices are influenced by genotype, mating status, and sex in Drosophila melanogaster
  
  
  
  
  Ecol Evol
  
  
  8
  
  :5385–5393
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  10.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Craig G.B.
     
  
  
  
  
  1967
  
  
  
  Mosquitoes: female monogamy induced by male accessory gland substance
  
  
  
  
  Science
  
  
  156
  
  :1499–1501
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  11.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Judson C.L
     
  
  
  
  
  1967
  
  
  
  Feeding and oviposition behavior in the mosquito Aedes aegypti (L.). I. Preliminary studies of physiological control mechanisms
  
  
  
  
  Biol Bull
  
  
  133
  
  :369–378
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  12.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Liu C.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Tian N.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Chang P.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Zhang W
     
  
  
  
  
  2024
  
  
  
  Mating reconciles fitness and fecundity by switching diet preference in flies
  
  
  
  
  Nature communications
  
  
  15
  
  :9912
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  13.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Liu H.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Kubli E
     
  
  
  
  
  2003
  
  
  
  Sex-peptide is the molecular basis of the sperm effect in Drosophila melanogaster
  
  
  
  
  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  
  
  100
  
  :9929–9933
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  14.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Chapman T.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Bangham J.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Vinti G.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Seifried B.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Lung O.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Wolfner M.F.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Smith H.K.
     
  
  
  8. 
     Partridge L
     
  
  
  
  
  2003
  
  
  
  The sex peptide of Drosophila melanogaster: Female post-mating responses analyzed by using RNA interference
  
  
  
  
  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  
  
  100
  
  :9923–9928
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  15.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Duvall L.B.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Basrur N.S.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Molina H.
     
  
  
  4. 
     McMeniman C.J.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Vosshall L.B
     
  
  
  
  
  2017
  
  
  
  A Peptide Signaling System that Rapidly Enforces Paternity in the Aedes aegypti Mosquito
  
  
  
  
  Current Biology
  
  
  27
  
  :3734–3742
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  16.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Wolfner M.F
     
  
  
  
  
  2002
  
  
  
  The gifts that keep on giving: physiological functions and evolutionary dynamics of male seminal proteins in Drosophila
  
  
  
  
  Heredity
  
  
  88
  
  :85–93
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  17.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Gorter J.A.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Jagadeesh S.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Gahr C.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Boonekamp J.J.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Levine J.D.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Billeter J.C
     
  
  
  
  
  2016
  
  
  
  The nutritional and hedonic value of food modulate sexual receptivity in Drosophila melanogaster females
  
  
  
  
  Sci Rep
  
  
  6
  
  :19441
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  18.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Chen P.S.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Stumm-Zollinger E.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Aigaki T.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Balmer J.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Bienz M.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Böhlen P
     
  
  
  
  
  1988
  
  
  
  A male accessory gland peptide that regulates reproductive behavior of female D. melanogaster
  
  
  
  
  Cell
  
  
  54
  
  :291–298
  
  
  
  https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(88)90192-4
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  19.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Ellendersen B.E.
     
  
  
  2. 
     von Philipsborn A.C.
     
  
  
  
  
  2017
  
  
  
  Neuronal modulation of D. melanogaster sexual behaviour
  
  
  
  
  Curr Opin Insect Sci
  
  
  24
  
  :21–28
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  20.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Klowden M.J
     
  
  
  
  
  1999
  
  
  The check is in the male: male mosquitoes affect female physiology and behavior
  
  
  
  J Am Mosq Control Assoc
  
  
  15
  
  :213–220
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  21.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Manning A
     
  
  
  
  
  1962
  
  
  
  A Sperm Factor Affecting the Receptivity of Drosophila Melanogaster Females
  
  
  
  
  Nature
  
  
  194
  
  :252–253
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  22.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     McCall P.J
     
  
  
  
  
  2000
  
  
  
  The biology of mosquitoes: volume 2, sensory reception and behaviour. By A.N. Clements (Wallingford, CABI Publishing, 1999). 740 pp. Hard cover £95.00 (US$175.00). ISBN 0 85199 313 3
  
  
  
  
  Bulletin of Entomological Research
  
  
  90
  
  :99–99
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  23.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Lung O.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Tram U.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Finnerty C.M.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Eipper-Mains M.A.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Kalb J.M.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Wolfner M.F
     
  
  
  
  
  2002
  
  
  The Drosophila melanogaster seminal fluid protein Acp62F is a protease inhibitor that is toxic upon ectopic expression
  
  
  
  Genetics
  
  
  160
  
  :211–224
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  24.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Zhang Y.J.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Zhang N.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Bu R.T.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Nässel D.R.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Gao C.F.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Wu S.F
     
  
  
  
  
  2025
  
  
  
  A novel male accessory gland peptide reduces female post-mating receptivity in the brown planthopper
  
  
  
  
  Plos Genet
  
  
  21
  
  :e1011699
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  25.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Rines I.G.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Harrod A.E.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Hunt J.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Sadd B.M.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Sakaluk S.K
     
  
  
  
  
  2023
  
  
  
  Disentangling effects of mating, nuptial gifts and accessory gland proteins on reproduction in female crickets
  
  
  
  
  Anim Behav
  
  
  196
  
  :1–7
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  26.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Tripet F.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Touré Y.T.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Dolo G.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Lanzaro G.C
     
  
  
  
  
  2003
  
  
  Frequency of multiple inseminations in field-collected Anopheles gambiae females revealed by DNA analysis of transferred sperm
  
  
  
  Am J Trop Med Hyg
  
  
  68
  
  :1–5
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  27.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Klowden M.J.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Russell R.C
     
  
  
  
  
  2004
  
  
  Mating affects egg maturation in Anopheles gambiae Giles (Diptera: Culicidae)
  
  
  
  J Vector Ecol
  
  
  29
  
  :135–139
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  28.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Naccarati C.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Audsley N.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Keen J.N.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Kim J.H.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Howell G.J.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Kim Y.J.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Isaac R.E
     
  
  
  
  
  2012
  
  
  
  The host-seeking inhibitory peptide, Aea-HP-1, is made in the male accessory gland and transferred to the female during copulation
  
  
  
  
  Peptides
  
  
  34
  
  :150–157
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  29.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Saudan P.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Hauck K.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Soller M.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Choffat Y.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Ottiger M.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Sporri M.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Ding Z.
     
  
  
  8. 
     Hess D.
     
  
  
  9. 
     Gehrig P.M.
     
  
  
  10. 
      Klauser S.
      
  
  
  11. 
      et al.
      
  
  
  
  
  2002
  
  
  
  Ductus ejaculatorius peptide 99B (DUP99B), a novel Drosophila melanogaster sex-peptide pheromone
  
  
  
  
  Eur J Biochem
  
  
  269
  
  :989–997
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  30.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Herndon L.A.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Wolfner M.F
     
  
  
  
  
  1995
  
  
  
  A Drosophila seminal fluid protein, Acp26Aa, stimulates egg laying in females for 1 day after mating
  
  
  
  
  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  
  
  92
  
  :10114–10118
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  31.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Mackay T.F.C.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Ram K.R.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Wolfner M.F
     
  
  
  
  
  2007
  
  
  
  Sustained Post-Mating Response in Drosophila melanogaster Requires Multiple Seminal Fluid Proteins
  
  
  
  
  Plos Genet
  
  
  3
  
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  32.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Heifetz Y.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Vandenberg L.N.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Cohn H.I.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Wolfner M.F
     
  
  
  
  
  2005
  
  
  
  Two cleavage products of the Drosophila accessory gland protein ovulin can independently induce ovulation
  
  
  
  
  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  
  
  102
  
  :743–748
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  33.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Desplan C.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Gligorov D.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Sitnik J.L.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Maeda R.K.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Wolfner M.F.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Karch F
     
  
  
  
  
  2013
  
  
  
  A Novel Function for the Hox Gene Abd-B in the Male Accessory Gland Regulates the Long-Term Female Post-Mating Response in Drosophila
  
  
  
  
  Plos Genet
  
  
  9
  
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  34.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Hopkins B.R.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Angus-Henry A.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Kim B.Y.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Carlisle J.A.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Thompson A.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Kopp A
     
  
  
  
  
  2024
  
  
  
  Decoupled evolution of the Sex Peptide gene family and Sex Peptide Receptor in Drosophilidae
  
  
  
  
  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  
  
  121
  
  :e2312380120
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  35.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Jang Y.-H.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Chae H.-S.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Kim Y.-J
     
  
  
  
  
  2017
  
  
  
  Female-specific myoinhibitory peptide neurons regulate mating receptivity in Drosophila melanogaster
  
  
  
  
  Nature communications
  
  
  8
  
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  36.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Chen J.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Zhu P.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Jin S.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Zhang Z.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Jiang S.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Li S.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Liu S.
     
  
  
  8. 
     Peng Q.
     
  
  
  9. 
     Pan Y
     
  
  
  
  
  2025
  
  
  
  A hormone-to-neuropeptide pathway inhibits sexual receptivity in immature Drosophila females
  
  
  
  
  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  
  
  122
  
  :e2418481122
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  37.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Avila F.W.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Sirot L.K.
     
  
  
  3. 
     LaFlamme B.A.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Rubinstein C.D.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Wolfner M.F
     
  
  
  
  
  2011
  
  
  
  Insect seminal fluid proteins: identification and function
  
  
  
  
  Annual review of entomology
  
  
  56
  
  :21–40
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  38.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Hasemeyer M.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Yapici N.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Heberlein U.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Dickson B.J
     
  
  
  
  
  2009
  
  
  
  Sensory Neurons in the Drosophila Genital Tract Regulate Female Reproductive Behavior
  
  
  
  
  Neuron
  
  
  61
  
  :511–518
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  39.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Rezával C.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Pavlou H.J.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Dornan A.J.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Chan Y.B.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Kravitz E.A.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Goodwin S.F
     
  
  
  
  
  2012
  
  
  
  Neural circuitry underlying Drosophila female postmating behavioral responses
  
  
  
  
  Current biology: CB
  
  
  22
  
  :1155–1165
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  40.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Auer T.O.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Benton R
     
  
  
  
  
  2016
  
  
  
  Sexual circuitry in Drosophila
  
  
  
  
  Curr Opin Neurobiol
  
  
  38
  
  :18–26
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  41.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Lin P.X.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Peng Y.X.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Xing J.Y.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Liu Z.Y.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Guo F.R.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Thia J.A.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Gao C.F.
     
  
  
  8. 
     Wu S.F
     
  
  
  
  
  2025
  
  
  
  Cis-regulation of the CYP6CS1 gene and its role in mediating cross-resistance in a pymetrozine-resistant strain of Nilaparvata lugens
  
  
  
  
  Insect biochemistry and molecular biology
  
  
  177
  
  :104261
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  42.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Wu S.F.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Zeng B.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Zheng C.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Mu X.C.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Zhang Y.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Hu J.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Zhang S.
     
  
  
  8. 
     Gao C.F.
     
  
  
  9. 
     Shen J.L
     
  
  
  
  
  2018
  
  
  
  The evolution of insecticide resistance in the brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens Stål) of China in the period 2012-2016
  
  
  
  
  Sci Rep
  
  
  8
  
  :4586
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  43.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Song X.Y.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Peng Y.X.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Wang L.X.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Ye W.N.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Pei X.G.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Zhang Y.C.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Zhang S.
     
  
  
  8. 
     Gao C.F.
     
  
  
  9. 
     Wu S.F
     
  
  
  
  
  2022
  
  
  
  Monitoring, cross-resistance, inheritance, and fitness costs of brown planthoppers, Nilaparvata lugens, resistance to pymetrozine in China
  
  
  
  
  Pest management science
  
  
  78
  
  :3980–3987
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  44.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Ye W.N.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Li Y.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Zhang Y.C.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Liu Z.Y.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Song X.Y.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Pei X.G.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Wu S.F.
     
  
  
  8. 
     Gao C.F.
     
  
  
  
  
  2024
  
  
  
  Area-wide survey and monitoring of insecticide resistance in the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stål), from 2020 to 2023 in China
  
  
  
  
  Pestic Biochem Physiol
  
  
  205
  
  :106173
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  45.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Tayler T.D.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Pacheco D.A.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Hergarden A.C.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Murthy M.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Anderson D.J
     
  
  
  
  
  2012
  
  
  
  A neuropeptide circuit that coordinates sperm transfer and copulation duration in Drosophila
  
  
  
  
  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  
  
  109
  
  :20697–20702
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  46.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Li H.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Cheng S.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Niu Y.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Diao T.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Zhang Q.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Zhang W.
     
  
  
  
  
  2025
  
  
  
  A heart releasing neuropeptide that synchronizes brain-heart regulation during courtship behavior
  
  
  
  
  bioRxiv
  
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  47.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Tayler T.D.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Pacheco D.A.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Hergarden A.C.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Murthy M.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Anderson D.J
     
  
  
  
  
  2012
  
  
  
  A neuropeptide circuit that coordinates sperm transfer and copulation duration in Drosophila
  
  
  
  
  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  
  
  109
  
  :20697–20702
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  48.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Gospocic J.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Shields E.J.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Glastad K.M.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Lin Y.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Penick C.A.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Yan H.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Mikheyev A.S.
     
  
  
  8. 
     Linksvayer T.A.
     
  
  
  9. 
     Garcia B.A.
     
  
  
  10. 
      Berger S.L.
      
  
  
  11. 
      et al.
      
  
  
  
  
  2017
  
  
  
  The Neuropeptide Corazonin Controls Social Behavior and Caste Identity in Ants
  
  
  
  
  Cell
  
  
  170
  
  :748–759
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  49.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Hou Q.-L.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Chen E.-H.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Jiang H.-B.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Yu S.-F.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Yang P.-J.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Liu X.-Q.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Park Y.
     
  
  
  8. 
     Wang J.-J.
     
  
  
  9. 
     Smagghe G
     
  
  
  
  
  2018
  
  
  
  Corazonin Signaling Is Required in the Male for Sperm Transfer in the Oriental Fruit Fly Bactrocera dorsalis
  
  
  
  
  Front Physiol
  
  
  9
  
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  50.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Shohat-Ophir G.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Kaun K.R.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Azanchi R.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Mohammed H.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Heberlein U
     
  
  
  
  
  2012
  
  
  
  Sexual deprivation increases ethanol intake in Drosophila
  
  
  
  
  Science
  
  
  335
  
  :1351–1355
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  51.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Zer-Krispil S.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Zak H.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Shao L.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Ben-Shaanan S.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Tordjman L.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Bentzur A.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Shmueli A.
     
  
  
  8. 
     Shohat-Ophir G
     
  
  
  
  
  2018
  
  
  
  Ejaculation Induced by the Activation of Crz Neurons Is Rewarding to Drosophila Males
  
  
  
  
  Current Biology
  
  
  28
  
  :1445–1452
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  52.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Cheng J.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Zhao P.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Zhu L.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Zhu F.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Tian Z.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Shen Z.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Liu X.
     
  
  
  8. 
     Liu X
     
  
  
  
  
  2022
  
  
  
  Corazonin signaling modulates the synthetic activity of male accessory gland in Grapholita molesta
  
  
  
  
  Int J Biol Macromol
  
  
  216
  
  :446–455
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  53.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Yang C.h.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Belawat P.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Hafen E.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Jan L.Y.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Jan Y.N.
     
  
  
  
  
  2008
  
  
  
  Drosophila Egg-Laying Site Selection as a System to Study Simple Decision-Making Processes
  
  
  
  
  Science
  
  
  319
  
  :1679–1683
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  54.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Tanaka Y.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Suetsugu Y.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Yamamoto K.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Noda H.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Shinoda T
     
  
  
  
  
  2014
  
  
  
  Transcriptome analysis of neuropeptides and G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) for neuropeptides in the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens
  
  
  
  
  Peptides
  
  
  53
  
  :125–133
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  55.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Roller L.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Tanaka Y.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Tanaka S
     
  
  
  
  
  2003
  
  
  
  Corazonin and corazonin-like substances in the central nervous system of the Pterygote and Apterygote insects
  
  
  
  
  Cell Tissue Res
  
  
  312
  
  :393–406
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  56.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Nässel D.R.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Zandawala M.
     
  
  
  
  
  2019
  
  
  
  Recent advances in neuropeptide signaling in Drosophila, from genes to physiology and behavior
  
  
  
  
  PeerJ Preprints
  
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  57.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Kubrak O.I.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Lushchak O.V.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Zandawala M.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Nässel D.R
     
  
  
  
  
  2016
  
  
  
  Systemic corazonin signalling modulates stress responses and metabolism in Drosophila
  
  
  
  
  Open Biol
  
  
  6
  
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  58.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Nallasivan M.P.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Singh D.N.D.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Saleh M.S.R.S.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Soller M
     
  
  
  
  
  2024
  
  
  Sex-peptide targets distinct higher order processing neurons in the brain to induce the female post-mating response
  
  
  
  eLife
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  59.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Isaac R.E.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Li C.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Leedale A.E.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Shirras A.D
     
  
  
  
  
  2010
  
  
  
  Drosophila male sex peptide inhibits siesta sleep and promotes locomotor activity in the post-mated female
  
  
  
  
  Proc Biol Sci
  
  
  277
  
  :65–70
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  60.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Bath E.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Bowden S.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Peters C.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Reddy A.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Tobias J.A.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Easton-Calabria E.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Seddon N.
     
  
  
  8. 
     Goodwin S.F.
     
  
  
  9. 
     Wigby S
     
  
  
  
  
  2017
  
  
  
  Sperm and sex peptide stimulate aggression in female Drosophila
  
  
  
  
  Nat Ecol Evol
  
  
  1
  
  :0154
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  61.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Predel R.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Neupert S.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Russell W.K.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Scheibner O.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Nachman R.J
     
  
  
  
  
  2007
  
  
  
  Corazonin in insects
  
  
  
  
  Peptides
  
  
  28
  
  :3–10
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  62.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Boerjan B.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Verleyen P.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Huybrechts J.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Schoofs L.
     
  
  
  5. 
     De Loof A.
     
  
  
  
  
  2010
  
  
  
  In search for a common denominator for the diverse functions of arthropod corazonin: a role in the physiology of stress?
  
  
  
  
  Gen Comp Endocrinol
  
  
  166
  
  :222–233
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  63.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Veenstra J.A
     
  
  
  
  
  2009
  
  
  
  Does corazonin signal nutritional stress in insects?
  
  
  
  
  Insect biochemistry and molecular biology
  
  
  39
  
  :755–762
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  64.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Zhao Y.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Bretz C.A.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Hawksworth S.A.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Hirsh J.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Johnson E.C
     
  
  
  
  
  2010
  
  
  
  Corazonin neurons function in sexually dimorphic circuitry that shape behavioral responses to stress in Drosophila
  
  
  
  
  Plos One
  
  
  5
  
  :e9141
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  65.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Veenstra J.A
     
  
  
  
  
  1989
  
  
  
  Isolation and structure of corazonin, a cardioactive peptide from the American cockroach
  
  
  
  
  Febs Lett
  
  
  250
  
  :231–234
  
  
  
  https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(89)80727-6
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  66.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Tawfik A.I.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Tanaka S.
     
  
  
  3. 
     De Loof A.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Schoofs L.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Baggerman G.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Waelkens E.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Derua R.
     
  
  
  8. 
     Milner Y.
     
  
  
  9. 
     Yerushalmi Y.
     
  
  
  10. 
      Pener M.P.
      
  
  
  
  
  1999
  
  
  
  Identification of the gregarization-associated dark-pigmentotropin in locusts through an albino mutant
  
  
  
  
  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  
  
  96
  
  :7083–7087
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  67.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Tanaka Y.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Hua Y.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Roller L.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Tanaka S
     
  
  
  
  
  2002
  
  
  
  Corazonin reduces the spinning rate in the silkworm, Bombyx mori
  
  
  
  
  J Insect Physiol
  
  
  48
  
  :707–714
  
  
  
  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1910(02)00094-x
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  68.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Kim Y.J.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Spalovská-Valachová I.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Cho K.H.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Zitnanova I.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Park Y.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Adams M.E.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Zitnan D
     
  
  
  
  
  2004
  
  
  
  Corazonin receptor signaling in ecdysis initiation
  
  
  
  
  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  
  
  101
  
  :6704–6709
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  69.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Imura E.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Shimada-Niwa Y.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Nishimura T.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Hückesfeld S.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Schlegel P.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Ohhara Y.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Kondo S.
     
  
  
  8. 
     Tanimoto H.
     
  
  
  9. 
     Cardona A.
     
  
  
  10. 
      Pankratz M.J.
      
  
  
  11. 
      Niwa R
      
  
  
  
  
  2020
  
  
  
  The Corazonin-PTTH Neuronal Axis Controls Systemic Body Growth by Regulating Basal Ecdysteroid Biosynthesis in Drosophila melanogaster
  
  
  
  
  Current biology: CB
  
  
  30
  
  :2156–2165
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  70.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Zandawala M.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Nguyen T.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Balanya Segura M.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Johard H.A.D.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Amcoff M.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Wegener C.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Paluzzi J.P.
     
  
  
  8. 
     Nassel D.R
     
  
  
  
  
  2021
  
  
  
  A neuroendocrine pathway modulating osmotic stress in Drosophila
  
  
  
  
  Plos Genet
  
  
  17
  
  :e1009425
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  71.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Xi J.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Hamanaka Y.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Shiga S
     
  
  
  
  
  2025
  
  
  
  Corazonin mediates photoperiodically induced diapause in the bean bug Riptortus pedestris
  
  
  
  
  J Exp Biol
  
  
  228
  
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  72.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Tian S.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Zandawala M.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Beets I.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Baytemur E.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Slade S.E.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Scrivens J.H.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Elphick M.R
     
  
  
  
  
  2016
  
  
  
  Urbilaterian origin of paralogous GnRH and corazonin neuropeptide signalling pathways
  
  
  
  
  Sci Rep
  
  
  6
  
  :28788
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  73.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Yañez Guerra L.A.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Zandawala M.
     
  
  
  
  
  2023
  
  
  
  Discovery of Paralogous GnRH and Corazonin Signaling Systems in an Invertebrate Chordate
  
  
  
  
  Genome Biol Evol
  
  
  15
  
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  74.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Knobil E
     
  
  
  
  
  1988
  
  
  
  The hypothalamic gonadotrophic hormone releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse generator in the rhesus monkey and its neuroendocrine control
  
  
  
  
  Hum Reprod
  
  
  3
  
  :29–31
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  75.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Millar R.P
     
  
  
  
  
  2005
  
  
  
  GnRHs and GnRH receptors
  
  
  
  
  Anim Reprod Sci
  
  
  88
  
  :5–28
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  76.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Bergland A.O.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Chae H.S.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Kim Y.J.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Tatar M
     
  
  
  
  
  2012
  
  
  
  Fine-scale mapping of natural variation in fly fecundity identifies neuronal domain of expression and function of an aquaporin
  
  
  
  
  Plos Genet
  
  
  8
  
  :e1002631
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  77.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Barredo C.G.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Gil-Marti B.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Deveci D.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Romero N.M.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Martin F.A
     
  
  
  
  
  2020
  
  
  
  Timing the Juvenile-Adult Neurohormonal Transition: Functions and Evolution
  
  
  
  
  Front Endocrinol
  
  
  11
  
  :602285
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  78.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     McKim T.H.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Gera J.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Gayban A.J.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Reinhard N.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Manoli G.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Hilpert S.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Helfrich-Förster C.
     
  
  
  8. 
     Zandawala M
     
  
  
  
  
  2024
  
  
  
  Synaptic connectome of a neurosecretory network in the Drosophila brain
  
  
  
  
  bioRxiv
  
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  79.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Wu S.-F.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Jv X.-M.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Li J.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Xu G.-J.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Cai X.-Y.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Gao C.-F
     
  
  
  
  
  2017
  
  
  
  Pharmacological characterisation and functional roles for egg-laying of a β-adrenergic-like octopamine receptor in the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens
  
  
  
  
  Insect biochemistry and molecular biology
  
  
  87
  
  :55–64
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  80.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Krogh A.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Larsson B.
     
  
  
  3. 
     von Heijne G.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Sonnhammer E.L.
     
  
  
  
  
  2001
  
  
  
  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes
  
  
  
  
  J Mol Biol
  
  
  305
  
  :567–580
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  81.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Livak K.J.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Schmittgen T.D
     
  
  
  
  
  2001
  
  
  
  Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method
  
  
  
  
  Methods
  
  
  25
  
  :402–408
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  82.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Sun H.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Bu L.-A.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Su S.-C.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Guo D.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Gao C.-F.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Wu S.-F
     
  
  
  
  
  2023
  
  
  
  Knockout of the odorant receptor co-receptor, orco, impairs feeding, mating and egg-laying behavior in the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda
  
  
  
  
  Insect biochemistry and molecular biology
  
  
  152
  
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  83.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Zhang Y.C.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Gao Y.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Ye W.N.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Peng Y.X.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Zhu K.Y.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Gao C.F
     
  
  
  
  
  2023
  
  
  
  CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of NlCYP6CS1 gene reveals its role in detoxification of insecticides in Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae)
  
  
  
  
  Pest management science
  
  
  79
  
  :2239–2246
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  


• 
  
  84.
  
  
  
  
  1. 
     Yan H.
     
  
  
  2. 
     Opachaloemphan C.
     
  
  
  3. 
     Carmona-Aldana F.
     
  
  
  4. 
     Mancini G.
     
  
  
  5. 
     Mlejnek J.
     
  
  
  6. 
     Descostes N.
     
  
  
  7. 
     Sieriebriennikov B.
     
  
  
  8. 
     Leibholz A.
     
  
  
  9. 
     Zhou X.
     
  
  
  10. 
      Ding L.
      
  
  
  11. 
      et al.
      
  
  
  
  
  2022
  
  
  
  Insulin signaling in the long-lived reproductive caste of ants
  
  
  
  
  Science
  
  
  377
  
  :1092–1099
  
  
  
  
  Google Scholar
  
  
  

Article and author information

Author information

1. 
   

   
   Ning Zhang
   

   
   
   
   State Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
   
   
   


2. 
   

   
   Shao-Cong Su
   

   
   
   
   State Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
   
   
   
   
   ORCID iD:
   
   0009-0007-3782-6657
   
   
   
   


3. 
   

   
   Ruo-Tong Bu
   

   
   
   
   State Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
   
   
   


4. 
   

   
   Yi-Jie Zhang
   

   
   
   
   State Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
   
   
   


5. 
   

   
   Lei Yang
   

   
   
   
   State Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
   
   
   


6. 
   

   
   Jie Chen
   

   
   
   
   State Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
   
   
   


7. 
   

   
   Dick R Nässel
   

   
   
   
   Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
   
   
   
   
   ORCID iD:
   
   0000-0002-1147-7766
   
   
   
   


8. 
   

   
   Cong-Fen Gao
   

   
   
   
   State Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
   
   
   
   
   ORCID iD:
   
   0000-0003-1991-0322
   
   
   
   


9. 
   

   
   Shun-Fan Wu
   

   
   
   
   State Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
   
   
   
   
   ORCID iD:
   
   0000-0003-0096-147X
   
   
   
   
   
   
   • 
     
     For correspondence:
     
     wusf@njau.edu.cn